|
© 2009 Thomas W. Goldman & Peter
J. Loughlin
In response to a question at a conference of the
Anti-Defamation League, Homeland Security Secretary Janet
Napolitano said she plans to work with governors to repeal the
REAL ID Act, which was passed in 2005. The Act has specific
identification requirements for driver’s licenses and
identification cards. While states would benefit by not
incurring the responsibilities and costs associated with
validating citizenship or permanent resident status for holders
of driver’s licenses, this move will certainly add to the
immigration controversy.Oddly,
although Secretary Napolitano is calling for repeal of the Act,
the official website for the Department of Homeland Security is
touting the value of the Act. The website says, “REAL ID is a
nationwide effort to improve the integrity and security of
state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards, which
in turn will help fight terrorism and reduce fraud.” The DHS
website goes on to say, “Raising the standards of state-issued
identification is an important step toward enhancing national
security. Because a driver’s license serves so many purposes
(access to federal buildings, nuclear power plants, boarding
aircraft, etc.) terrorists actively seek fraudulent
state-issued identification.”
By reverting to the laws in place prior to the REAL ID Act,
more is at stake than just the states saving money. For one
thing, the 9/11 commission believed the Act was necessary for
security reasons, according to Rep. James Sensenbrenner,
R-Wis., a sponsor of the law. And, other provisions affect the
manner in which immigrants can live and work in the United
States.
For example, the REAL ID Act raises the bar for establishing
refugee status by requiring corroboration of evidence in
Immigration Court hearings. In most cases now, the refugee
cannot simply rely on his or her testimony. Evidence such as
newspaper articles, police reports, medical reports, etc. must
be filed to support a case.
Rather than seeing us step back from the REAL ID Act, the
current law needs to be enforced until Congress debates and
passes a law which addresses security and immigration, as well
as the economic issues faced by the states due to the
immigration policies we now have.
Efforts to address these issues are finally moving forward
again. The Immigration Policy Center just announced that on
April 30, 2009 the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on
Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship will begin
hearings on common sense solutions to immigration. Hopefully,
we will see some results this time around.
|